ul > li
Sure maybe ul.class > li made sense, but take away the class, and this bit of CSS is pure donkey status.
Every ul has a direct descendant li, so ul > li is basically the same as ul li.
ul > li
Sure maybe ul.class > li made sense, but take away the class, and this bit of CSS is pure donkey status.
Every ul has a direct descendant li, so ul > li is basically the same as ul li.
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
In:
“ul>li>ol>li”
“ul>li” only affect:
“ul>li”
BUT
“ul li” affect:
“ul>li”
AND
“ul>li>ol>li”